Norton vs malwarebytes vs mcafee archive#

I tried to visit over 50 phishing sites, and Norton blocked every one of them. Norton has a powerful web security shield called Safe Web. Similarly, it blocked my ransomware simulator before it could encrypt any files, which was great. McAfee’s real-time scanner blocked 100% of malware files before I could download them onto my system. I could still browse the web and social media, but I experienced a lot of buffering and lag while streaming videos and playing games. What’s more, the full-disk scan really slowed down my computer. I was really impressed with the flawless detection rate - however, McAfee’s full scan took 1 hour to complete, which is 20 minutes more than Norton.

Norton vs malwarebytes vs mcafee archive#

I used the same archive to test McAfee as I used to test Norton, containing the 1,000s of malware samples of all kinds. Just like Norton, McAfee’s full system scan scored a 100% malware detection rate in my tests. McAfee’s antivirus scanner is just as good as Norton’s. It uses heuristic analysis and a huge malware database to protect your system from known and new malware. Many competitors fail to block ransomware at all. It even detected and blocked malware samples in encrypted folders - which is really cool.įinally, I tried running a ransomware simulator on my computer, and Norton blocked the simulator before it could even begin running. Norton’s real-time malware protection is just as impressive, immediately blocking any malware I tried downloading. I downloaded 1,000s of malware samples, including worms, trojans, keyloggers, rootkits, ransomware, cryptojackers, and more, and Norton was able to find all of them during a full scan, which took only 40 minutes to finish. Norton detected 100% of the infected files in my tests.

It uses advanced machine learning, heuristic analysis, and a massive malware database to detect and prevent malware. Norton’s anti-malware engine is one of the best on the market.